Assessment of CO2 Emissions Life Cycle in the Fuel Cell Electric Truck Sector, United States, 2024 2040
Published on: 09-Sep-2024 | SKU: AU_2024_1006

Need more details?
$4,950.00
DownloadLink
Need more details?

In this study, Frost & Sullivan offers a comprehensive exploration of the carbon dioxide (CO2) trail of a fuel cell electric truck (FCET) by investigating the carbon emission implications of FCETs, particularly with focus on hydrogen as a prospective fuel for the trucking industry in the United States. Our analysis begins with the rationale for considering hydrogen, highlighting its potential to mitigate life cycle emissions as compared to conventional fuels.

We delve into various hydrogen production methods, ranging from grey hydrogen to renewable sources, each carrying distinct carbon footprints. Emphasis falls on the CO2 emissions associated with manufacturing fuel cell vehicles, pinpointing significant contributions from components including fuel cell stacks and hydrogen storage tanks. Furthermore, we project total CO2 emissions throughout the operation of a truck, drawing comparative insights with its battery electric and diesel truck counterparts.

Ultimately, this study underscores the urgency of transitioning to cleaner hydrogen production methods and optimizing vehicle manufacturing to achieve substantial CO2 emission reductions in the trucking sector.

The study period is 2023 to 2030.

Author: Christus Divyan

The Impact of the Top

Transformative Megatrends 

WHY:

  • Clean transportation is gaining momentum as a Megatrend, with new mobility models shaping the industry's future. 
  • Various trends in clean transportation, such as battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs), are gaining traction. 
  • Frost Perspective 
  • The adoption of zero-emission powertrains, such as electric or fuel cell, in the trucking industry will largely depend on the cost of ownership, state of infrastructure, and government support. 
  • Industry transformation will lead to the emergence of new players and their disruption among existing players.


Industry Convergence

WHY:

  • A life cycle CO2 emission assessment brings different segments of the industry together. The energy sourcing companies, hydrogen generation plants, fuel transportation, and fuel dispensing outlets need to collaborate to ensure the carbon trail for an FCET remains minimal.

Frost Perspective

  • Regulatory authorities must lay out CO2 tracking plans to make sure all industry players understand the importance of ensuring total life cycle CO2 neutrality. A few countries have begun rolling out regulations to track CO2 emissions; it is expected that the United States and Europe will lead the regulatory environment by 2030. 


Geopolitical Chaos

WHY:

  • The life cycle assessment of a FCET goes beyond borders. For example, countries such as Australia and the Republic of the Congo mine minerals for batteries, China refines the minerals, and South Korea assembles the batteries. The final vehicles operate in the United States. As such, stakeholders must ensure carbon neutrality across the global supply chain. 

Frost Perspective

  • Truck OEMs and regulatory authorities must plan for global supply chain constraints, with the push toward local manufacturing to ensure more control of the complete process and to avoid geopolitical impacts on the transition to clean energy transportation. 

Research Scope:

Base Year2023  
Study Period2023–2030 (purchase years); 2023–2037 (user years)
Forecast Period2024–2030 (purchase years); 2024–2037 (user years), H2 adoption forecast until 2040 
Market/Segment/Program Area
  • Market 
Zero-emission trucks 
  • Segment 
Light-duty trucks (LDTs), medium-duty trucks (MDTs), and heavy-duty trucks (HDTs) 
  • User Cycle 
User cycle refers to the usage years (first life); Study illustrates cycles A and H 
  • Program Area 
Mobility  
Geographic ScopeUnited States - California, Texas and the Southwest (Arizona & New Mexico combined)

 

Growth Drivers

Life Cycle CO2 Emission Assessment of FCETs: Growth Drivers

Driver

1. Shift toward Clean Energy Generation: The source of hydrogen production is an important factor impacting CO2 emissions. The United States depends heavily on NG, and the move toward renewable sources will positively impact CO2 emissions.

2. Ease of Long-range Driving and Refueling: With specialized H2 infrastructure, refilling a truck's H2 tank with gaseous H2 (GH2) gas only takes a few minutes, significantly shorter than the extended recharge period for BEVs. In many use cases, the present generation of FCEVs already boasts a good driving range, making them economically appealing to fleet operators.

3. Higher Energy Storage: H2 offers a notable advantage over EV batteries by requiring significantly less weight and volume to achieve the same range. For instance, a FCET can cover the same distance as an EV with a lithium-ion battery system while carrying only a fraction of the weight and volume, making it a compelling choice for commercial vehicle transportation to balance range and cargo capacity.

4. Scalability Based on Application: FCEVs provide extensive scalability options. To generate the required electricity for truck propulsion, individual fuel cells connect in series, forming a fuel cell stack. This feature makes FCETs a practical and viable choice for heavy-duty transportation applications.

Why is it Increasingly Difficult to Grow?

The Strategic Imperative 8™

The Impact of the Top Three Strategic Imperatives on the CO2 Emissions of Fuel Cell Electric Truck (FCET) Industry

Hydrogen is the Fuel of the Future

Life Cycle CO2 Flow of a Fuel Cell Electric Truck

Different Methods of Producing Hydrogen

Research Scope

Powertrain Technology Segmentation

Growth Drivers

Growth Restraints

Analysis of Major Hydrogen Production Methods

Analysis of Major Hydrogen Production Methods (continued)

Analysis of Major Hydrogen Production Methods (continued)

Key Factors Impacting Adoption of H2 Production Methods

Factor 1: Lower CO2 Emissions & Readiness Levels

Factor 2: Clean Hydrogen Programs and Targets

Factor 3: States’ H2 Production Potential & Plan

Adoption Forecast of H2 Production in California

Adoption Forecast of H2 Production in the Southwest

Adoption Forecast of H2 Production in Texas

CO2 Emission Trail from H2 Production

Major Components of a Fuel Cell Electric Truck

Fuel Cell Stack

Hydrogen Storage Tanks

Battery

CO2 Emission Trail: Manufacture of an FCET

LDT Use Case Characteristics and Forecast Assumptions

LDT Cycle A & H—H2 Consumption and CO2 Emissions

LDT Cycle A to H—kgCO2 Per Mile

MDT Use Case Characteristics and Forecast Assumptions

MDT Cycle A & H—H2 Consumption and CO2 Emissions

MDT Cycle A to H — kgCO2 per Mile

HDT Use Case Characteristics and Forecast Assumptions

HDT—Cycle A

HDT—Cycle H

HDT Cycle A to H—kgCO2 Per Mile

LDT: ICE, BEV, and FCEV Comparison (Cycle A & H)

MDT: ICE, BEV, and FCEV Comparison (Cycle A & H)

HDT: ICE, BEV, and FCEV Comparison (Cycle A & H)

Top 3 Takeaways

Growth Opportunity 1: CO2 Emissions Tracking

Growth Opportunity 1: CO2 Emissions Tracking (continued)

Growth Opportunity 2: Geographic-specific Vertical Integration for Battery and Fuel Cell Manufacture

Growth Opportunity 2: Geographic-specific Vertical Integration for Battery and Fuel Cell Manufacture (continued)

Growth Opportunity 3: Hydrogen Infrastructure Expansion

Growth Opportunity 3: Hydrogen Infrastructure Expansion (continued)

Best Practices Recognition

Frost Radar

Benefits and Impacts of Growth Opportunities

Next Steps

List of Exhibits

List of Exhibits (continued)

Legal Disclaimer

List of Figures
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Hydrogen Is the Fuel of the Future, US, 2024
  • FCETs: Life Cycle CO? Flow, US, 2024
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Methods of Producing Hydrogen, US, 2024
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Powertrain Technology Segmentation, US, 2024
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Growth Drivers, US, 2024–2037
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Growth Restraints, US, 2024–2037
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Analysis of H? Production Methods, US, 2024
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Analysis of H2 Production Method, US, 2024
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Key H? Production Adoption Factors, US, 2024
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Impact of H? production-wise CO? Emission Trail, US, 2023 & 2040
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Impact of Clean H? Programs and Targets, US, 2023–2030
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: States’ H2 Production Potential & Plan, US, 2024
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Adoption Forecast of H? Production, California, 2023–2040
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Adoption Forecast of H2 Production, Southwest, 2023–2040
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Adoption Forecast of H? Production, Texas, 2023–2040
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: CO2 Emission Trail from H? Production, TX, CA, Southwest, 2023–2040
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Major Components and Their CO? Contribution, US, 2024
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: CO? Contribution from Fuel Cell Stack, US, 2024
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: CO? Contribution from H? Storage Tank, US, 2024
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: CO? Contribution from Battery, US, 2023
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: CO? Emission Trail from Manufacture of a FCET, US, 2023–2030
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: LDT Use Case Characteristics and Assumptions, Texas, 2023–2037
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: LDT Cycle A & H, US, 2023–2037
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: LDT kgCO?/mile, US, 2023–2037
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: MDT Use Case Characteristics and Assumptions, California, 2023–2036
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: MDT Cycle A & H, US, 2023–2036
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: MDT kgCO?/mile, US, 2023–2036
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: HDT Use Case Characteristics and Assumptions, US, 2023–2033
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Cycle A, US, 2023–2026
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Cycle H, US, 2030–2033
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: HDT kgCO?/mile, US, 2023–2033
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: LDT Total CO? Emission Comparison, US, 2023–2037
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: MDT Total CO? Emission Comparison, US, 2023–2036
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: HDT Total CO? Emission Comparison, US, 2023–2033
  • Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Top 3 Takeaways, US, 2023

Have questions about this research or need deeper insights?
Speak directly with our analytics experts for tailored recommendations.
Purchase includes:
  • Report download
  • Growth Dialog™ with our experts

Growth Dialog™

A tailored session with you where we identify the:
  • Strategic Imperatives
  • Growth Opportunities
  • Best Practices
  • Companies to Action

Impacting your company's future growth potential.

In this study, Frost & Sullivan offers a comprehensive exploration of the carbon dioxide (CO2) trail of a fuel cell electric truck (FCET) by investigating the carbon emission implications of FCETs, particularly with focus on hydrogen as a prospective fuel for the trucking industry in the United States. Our analysis begins with the rationale for considering hydrogen, highlighting its potential to mitigate life cycle emissions as compared to conventional fuels. We delve into various hydrogen production methods, ranging from grey hydrogen to renewable sources, each carrying distinct carbon footprints. Emphasis falls on the CO2 emissions associated with manufacturing fuel cell vehicles, pinpointing significant contributions from components including fuel cell stacks and hydrogen storage tanks. Furthermore, we project total CO2 emissions throughout the operation of a truck, drawing comparative insights with its battery electric and diesel truck counterparts. Ultimately, this study underscores the urgency of transitioning to cleaner hydrogen production methods and optimizing vehicle manufacturing to achieve substantial CO2 emission reductions in the trucking sector. The study period is 2023 to 2030. Author: Christus Divyan
More Information
Deliverable Type Market Research
Author Christus Divyan
Industries Automotive
No Index No
Is Prebook No
Keyword 1 Fuel Cell Truck CO2 Emissions
Keyword 2 Electric Truck Sector
Keyword 3 Clean Transportation Solutions
List of Charts and Figures Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Hydrogen Is the Fuel of the Future, US, 2024~ FCETs: Life Cycle CO? Flow, US, 2024~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Methods of Producing Hydrogen, US, 2024~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Powertrain Technology Segmentation, US, 2024~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Growth Drivers, US, 2024–2037~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Growth Restraints, US, 2024–2037~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Analysis of H? Production Methods, US, 2024~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Analysis of H2 Production Method, US, 2024~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Key H? Production Adoption Factors, US, 2024~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Impact of H? production-wise CO? Emission Trail, US, 2023 & 2040~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Impact of Clean H? Programs and Targets, US, 2023–2030~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: States’ H2 Production Potential & Plan, US, 2024~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Adoption Forecast of H? Production, California, 2023–2040~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Adoption Forecast of H2 Production, Southwest, 2023–2040~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Adoption Forecast of H? Production, Texas, 2023–2040~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: CO2 Emission Trail from H? Production, TX, CA, Southwest, 2023–2040~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Major Components and Their CO? Contribution, US, 2024~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: CO? Contribution from Fuel Cell Stack, US, 2024~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: CO? Contribution from H? Storage Tank, US, 2024~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: CO? Contribution from Battery, US, 2023~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: CO? Emission Trail from Manufacture of a FCET, US, 2023–2030~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: LDT Use Case Characteristics and Assumptions, Texas, 2023–2037~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: LDT Cycle A & H, US, 2023–2037~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: LDT kgCO?/mile, US, 2023–2037~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: MDT Use Case Characteristics and Assumptions, California, 2023–2036~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: MDT Cycle A & H, US, 2023–2036~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: MDT kgCO?/mile, US, 2023–2036~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: HDT Use Case Characteristics and Assumptions, US, 2023–2033~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Cycle A, US, 2023–2026~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Cycle H, US, 2030–2033~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: HDT kgCO?/mile, US, 2023–2033~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: LDT Total CO? Emission Comparison, US, 2023–2037~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: MDT Total CO? Emission Comparison, US, 2023–2036~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: HDT Total CO? Emission Comparison, US, 2023–2033~ Life Cycle CO? Emission Assessment of FCETs: Top 3 Takeaways, US, 2023~
Podcast No
Predecessor PECC-01-00-00-00
WIP Number PFI2-01-00-00-00

Assessment of CO2 Emissions Life Cycle in the Fuel Cell Electric Truck Sector, United States, 2024 2040

AutomotiveAssessment of CO2 Emissions Life Cycle in the Fuel Cell Electric Truck Sector, United States, 2024 2040

Adoption of Clean Hydrogen Production Sources Will Drive Transformational Growth in Sustainable Transportation Due to Reductions in CO2 Emissions by 43% Per FCET

RELEASE DATE
09-Sep-2024
REGION
Global
Deliverable Type
Market Research
Research Code: PFI2-01-00-00-00
SKU: AU_2024_1006
AvailableYesPDF Download
$4,950.00
In stock
SKU
AU_2024_1006